META-Health is a Trauma-Informed Practice

Prof Bessel van der Kolk
I recently attended a seminar on trauma, presented by Professor Bessel van der Kolk who spent many decades of his life as clinical psychiatrist researching and treating the impact of emotional adverse events on the brains and bodies of children and adults. I find that his work validates the understanding of UDIN experiences (unexpected, dramatic, isolating, no strategy) as triggers for changes in the brain, that META-Health adopted from Dr Ryke Geert Hamer. Also, Hamer’s concept of conflict constellations creating Meta-programs that shape or alter our personality shone through Bessel’s presentation. Let me explain.

Frozen in Trauma

One of the first points he made is that typical reactions to the trauma experienced in war seem to have changed. Veteran soldiers from WW1 often showed sluggish, restricted movement, frozen faces and awkwardness. They might tremble repetitively. This matches a “freeze” state of the autonomic nervous system that the body then tries to shake off, but conditioned triggers keep the freeze loop in place.
While awaiting attacks from ground and air forces, the soldiers hiding in the trenches almost necessarily had conflicts of prohibited and suppressed (“frozen”) motion. Moreover, they had to numb their fears and emotions in order to function, both in combat and later in life if they survived the horrors. Consequently, many lost the capability to feel pleasure.

In the brain, the functioning of the motor cortex and cerebellum are altered by the freeze loop. To prevent or to heal this impact of trauma, movement is essential – to feel able to run, to feel some agency, and to reconnect with the resources of both brain hemispheres!

Disrupted Social Interaction

Bessel shared that the typical symptoms of PTSD have changed over time. He illustrated this with a scene from the movie “Warriors”, which is about a Afghanistan war veteran who observes a scene of a crying child and screaming mother in the supermarket. While he seems to have lost focus and purpose for the actions of his daily life, he is attracted to the emotional fight for dominance and interferes, scaring the child and blaming her for her unreasonable behaviour. The mother and bystanders turn against him, and he is ostracised.

Empathy and the code of acceptable social interaction, which in the brain are connected to the anterior cingulate and the fronto-temporal prefrontal cortex, are clearly being impaired by the sustained trauma of violence. This can lead to bouts of rage and cruelty and to changes in the reward system where the traumatized learns to feel pleasure from hurting or from being hurt, instead of numbing their own sensations. This is particularly true in the case of “moral injury”. To explain that term we want to look at our “social immune system” first.

Bonding and Shunning

In order to feel safe and protected together with other humans, we have a face-heart-connection of recognizing social signals, such as a smile that calms our heart rate and makes us feel good. The work of Stephen Porges delves deeply into the ventral vagus nerve and its role in the “social engagement system”. This system is established by the interaction of the mother with her baby. Newborns mirror the facial expression of a person opposite to them and learn how to build a range of expressions for emotions and recognize those they “belong” to. Physical touch from our near ones relaxes us and reduces pain by the release of oxytocin, the neurotransmitter of belonging.

People like to get along with each other, and their fights are usually more about their role in the community than about actual survival. The “social immune system” is about knowing who belongs to our community and who doesn’t, who we intuitively trust and who we don’t, and how much distance we find appropriate to keep between the other and ourselves. Naturally, the less another person looks and behaves like us, the more this system kicks in to make us skeptical and pulls us back into our own safe tribe – just as the child and the people in the supermarket do in the scene from “Warriors”.

To make people fight wars and kill each other, propaganda utilizes this system by emphasizing and exploiting these differences to the point of de-humanizing the enemy. Our morals and ethics build upon the social engagement system and tell us that we have more similarities than differences, and that other humans have basically the same needs and the same rights as us. But are those enemies humans, who are said to “slaughter babies”?!

Disgust is a feeling that belongs to the “social immune system” and that pulls us away from a threat to our health. In a “moral injury”, the injured person breached their own moral standards, e.g. by recognizing it was actually humans they killed. They now feel disgusted with themselves. To survive such an injury, a “trauma identity” with a logic of its own forms in the person – and by the way, the same is true for whole societies and their cultural traumas! Meanwhile, this identity also keeps them from healing.

Can Imprinted Trauma be Overcome?

I can’t but think of Dr Hamer’s concept of “constellations” that alter and shape our personalities in various ways, to adapt to situations of sustained unresolved conflict. The changes in our brain and behaviour make sense, and they are self-maintaining, creating our beliefs that match our way to perceive and evaluate what happens around us. Can peace ever be possible, given that most of us seem to be traumatized on some level, very often in childhood when social bonding and our capability to trust was disrupted?

On a side note, it was already observed by Pierre Janet in the early 20th century that failing to integrate traumatic experiences can halt the development and maturation of our personality:

All traumatized people seem to have the evolution of their lives halted: they are attached to an insurmountable obstacle.

Dr Hamer said the same about the impact of “territorial constellations” (i.e. several conflicts about our place and role in society, that affect both brain hemispheres) at an early age. How often do we see adults not acting as the free, compassionate, rational, responsible beings that they should be?

Trauma-Informed Practice

To heal, a traumatized person has to see and try other options. How can that be done, given an established trauma identity? Obviously, medication to numb and calm is only covering the festering wound. But using movement, mirroring, art, sound, and touch are ways to influence and stimulate the brain regions in similar ways as to how the social engagement system develops in kids.

The goals and steps of overcoming trauma, according to Bessel van der Kolk, are:

  1. (Re-)establishing community
  2. Effective action
  3. Dealing with affect regulation
  4. Accessing the emotional brain – knowing oneself
  5. Dealing with parts
  6. Processing traumatic memories
  7. Rewiring neural circuits

And that resembles exactly how we work in META-Health, in a variety of ways!

There is a range of tools and methods that have been shown to help in this process, so that there is hope that trauma healing for individuals as well as societies can be attempted by collaborating therapists, trauma-informed practitioners and self-help groups:

  • Trauma Releasing Exercises: TRE® utilizes muscle stretch reflexes, voluntary contraction of muscles induced by quick stretches, and tremoring to release tension and stress. Shaking and shivering are a natural way to exit the freeze mode that is a typical reaction upon trauma. Evidence
  • Trauma tapping“: This method works by tactile stimulation of points mostly in the face (gently tapping the skin with the fingertips). The face-heart connection via the ventral vagus nerve and its implications for social signalling and co-regulation among mammals have been described by Stephen Porges. Research about tapping for PTSD
  • EMDR: This technique involves moving the eyes repeatedly from side to side like in a hypnosis induction. While doing that we stay in touch with our feelings and/or trauma, eventually processing them in the brain. Also other “cross-over” movements, ball playing or dancing do the same by stimulating connectivity between the brain hemispheres. Evidence
  • Sound and Rhythm: Just as singing or humming are self-soothing, harmonizing behaviours, the use of instruments like gong, sound-bowl, or drums helps in accessing emotions and changing the impact of trauma. Evidence;
    Watch the webinar “Sound, breathing and healing“ and get your own impression
  • Yoga: The core principles to be re-learned from yoga practice include choice, interoception, taking effective action, and present-moment experience. Evidence
  • Animal Care: Humans and mammals share the same social engagement system. When we have lost trust in fellow humans or in ourselves, animals can fill the gap and help to reconnect us to bonding and caring for one another. Evidence
  • Theater Playing: By trying on different roles with distinct behaviours and emotions, we can explore new experiences without being judged for the role we’re playing. Examples
  • Changing the Story: We know that our mind creates the story to match our impressions and emotions, and that even our memory changes over time. Like in playing theatre, amending our story with resources to have a happier ending and to provide learning for the future, can give us peace of mind. Memory reconsolidation can be facilitated by combining renegotiation of the trauma with other techniques previously mentioned, like in Hypnosis, Matrix Reimprinting, Inner Child work or Wingwave coaching. Study, Review
  • Assistance by Psychedelic Drugs: By inducing a sense of empathy, euphoria, and reduced fear responses, the therapeutic use of MDMA (Extasy) has shown to be very effective in helping to re-establish self-compassion and to access a meta-view of the trauma. Evidence

Learn META-Health and become a certified Practitioner !


pictures:
Bessel van der Kolk
WW1 Trenches Scene by Gordon Griffiths, CC BY-SA 2.0 via Wikimedia Commons
John Hains via Pixabay
Ortal Pelleg

I thank Heather Lakatos and Mariyam Suboh for their help in reviewing this article.

Freeze or Super Powers?

META-Health uses cutting-edge scientific findings and models to explore and explain stress-related diseases and various symptoms in their social-emotional context.

A base for this is the model of the 5 biological laws of nature which describes the dynamic process of self-healing after stress and trauma: the intelligent body adapts temporarily to exceptional needs – a necessary reaction that leads to be counterbalanced in the regeneration phase after the threat is gone.

This “Yin-Yang model” of polarity is enriched by the findings of neuroscience which I presented on the International META-Health Conference in Mumbai, february 2017. Stephen Porges´ Polyvagal theory explains the happenings in the UDIN moment (Unexpected, Dramatic, Isolating, No strategy) and highlights the social advantage of mammals which we can consciously use to find better conflict strategies and to dissolve trauma.


Informed choices and that gut feeling

Angelina JolieThe media and discussions these days are filled with the preventive double mastectomy of Angelina Jolie. Comments range from acclaim for her courage and consistency, shock about voluntary self-mutilation with dubious sense, up to the representation of the famous actress as a pawn and figurehead for corporations who make money on such measures.

In her own opinion, published in the New York Times [1], she describes the reasons for her decision: her mother had died after 10 years of battle with breast cancer at age 56 – therefore Jolie let her genes be tested, whereby mutation of the “breast cancer gene” BRCA1 was detected. Her physicians estimated her risk of developing breast cancer at 87%.

When I knew that this is my reality, I have decided to be proactive and to minimize the risk as much as possible.”

After having described the three-month procedure of the stepwise intervention with gentle removal and reconstruction of the breasts, she reveals the motivation for her openness:

“I want to encourage every woman, especially if you have a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, to seek out the information and medical experts who can help you through this aspect of your life, and to make your own informed choices.

I acknowledge that there are many wonderful holistic doctors working on alternatives to surgery.

Fear and reality

I do respect Angelina Jolie fully in her decision to meet her reality of a “sword of Damocles” in a way that takes the fear off her and her children. For me and my clients, I also want to achieve to not make decisions led by fear, but by the certainty of finding peace, inner balance and strength in them. In my opinion, good therapists are characterized by supporting their clients on the basis of their own personality and choice, and also by referring on to appropriate specialists if needed.

Fears are there to motivate us to move away from the threat. Fears are produced by a brain area that is not rationally questioned – the so-called reptilian brain, which takes care of the basic needs of survival, predominating everything else. So far about the biological background of this early warning system.

When we look at what gives people fear, it’s not just obvious dangers and threats. Symbols of previously experienced powerlessness which can be memories or even heard or read stories, can make us see inner pictures of horrors. Do all these symbols represent a generally valid background of real threat? No – because fairy tales and fantasy films can cause the same anxiety reactions. This may even be used intentionally to influence the public – or to educate children …

Fear can as well be caused by a distorted view. This is particularly obvious in so called “anxiety disorders” and phobias, where harmless things in the everyday environment for some individuals have become symbols of fear, affecting their whole lives and social contacts . It seems legitimate and reasonable to treat such “overanxiety” in order to change it. Fear is therefore not to be seen digital as “all or nothing”, but the feeling should ideally match the current context.

Often, a scenario of fear changes with extended experience and understanding. A new environment, lack of overview, unusual challenges that trigger stress and anxiety, after a while lose their signal effect on our alerting system. This happens even in the case of real dangers! Examples are measures of occupational safety, which may be nonchalated by highly experienced workers more often than by unexperienced ones, leading to accidents. Even more persistent threats, disasters such as the nuclear accident in Fukushima, no longer seem to persist in our consciousness after a time of fear and turmoil. Anxiety decreases to the extent of one´s emotional gaining of control, getting distance, or where it recedes into the background

The fear of cancer

The concept of cancer and the associated ideas of sickness and death means anxiety for the majority of today´s people. This fear is produced by horrific images that come not only from their own memory of a deceased relative or friend, but also from the media portraying heroic cancer-fighting medics and patients. Many of the horrendous symptoms you see, however, are stemming rather from the therapy than from the cancer itself.

Medical science admits that it is not aware of the causes of many diseases, including all cancer processes. Thus the survival rate five years after completion of treatment is no valid evidence of healing, but a arbitrarily drawn line for statistic documentation . The fear of recurrence or metastasis remains. And – without ethical evaluation from my side – a growing sector of the pharmaceutical and medical technology benefits from lifelong screening and treating the collateral damage of the cancer treatment.

Even cancer is a strategy

In the understanding of META-Health the processes that, only if they occur very violently, during a long time, or under suboptimum conditions, develop into pathological cancers, have a function for us. They are started under very specific conditions with a biological conflict shock, an isolating trauma. In natural conditions, which unfortunately have become rather uncommon in today´s societies, the physiological responses were meant to help just to solve this problem in a timely manner.

META-Health symptom analysisIn the case of cancer in the breast glands (there are different types of breast cancer that would address other traumatic perceptions), a big concern or dispute triggers a response to produce more milk for protection and nourishment .
Only when a woman has experienced such feelings traumatically, she will get this type of cancer, and if the reason for this response is resolved, the body will autonomously restore the normal function, stop the growth and dissolve or encapsule the tumor cells.

The mechanisms of autonomous cancer reduction by inflammation and apoptosis are known [2]. This occurs under conditions that are “back to normal”, ie according to an internal “all-clear” conflict resolution.

This means that every person can have cancer cells in their body, without incurring a pathological cancer, as long as she finds the means to discharge her emotions that froze in the instant, and to resolve her conflict soon. The fact of having and handling cancer processes resembles even genes being switched on or off by perceptional triggering or by inhibition.

A Danish study from 2008 [3] confirms that mammographical screening, because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, leads to no more cancer survivors, but to more women being labeled as ill.

What do genes express?

Genes are blueprints for characteristics both physiological and psychological that are passed on from ancestors to descendants. Just as in early childhood learning where you cut your teeth on certain behavioral strategies that stay with you as more or less unconscious patterns running “on autopilot”, providing you with a proven strategy as basis for survival and handling challenges. But do all of them remain throughout your life? In the course of your life many of those will be outgrown and replaced by behaviors that now seem more appropriate , because the environment has changed and you have learned through own new experiences.

This is similar to genes being turned on and off through mechanisms that are explored in the science of epigenetics. Trigger for switching off a gene segment are environmental stimuli and our bodymind´s evaluation whether to use old or to add new information to the system [4] [5].

Own experienced traumas are stored in epigenetic “cellular memory” and through them being healed, our patterns of reacting change right down to the cellular level!

Die epigenetische Landschaft und ihre Bedeutung für direktes Reprogrammieren

Namely cell biologist Dr Bruce Lipton clarifies in his book “The biology of belief“, how the intelligent control center of our cells is not the nucleus with the genetic information, but the cell membrane which absorbs or rejects molecules of information. The decision to accept or reject information, to activate a gene or shut it down, is prompted by our ATTITUDE. The same that leads to our perception of reality.

In my article on the placebo-surgery I have examined the power of belief and imagination. This alone only lets the body autonomously carry out cleaning and healing processes which were previously thought to make technical interventions necessary.

Your own reality

What would be possible in the context of your beliefs, your thinking and evaluating? How can you break away from fears and catastrophic ideas that activate genes such as BRCA1, and replace them with better strategies that will turn off the BRCA1 as *unnecessary response*?

Here the placebo and nocebo effects come in. Logic and pseudo-logic influence the reinforcement or the re-evaluation of those personal experiences which create our perceived reality and future. The power of information that passes our filters unquestioned. Nocebo is the negative sister of placebo, this means, for example, the hypnosis limiting our reality potential by constantly recurring (scaring) views in media and environment. The judgment of a physician weighs heavier than one´s own hope and often even heavier than one´s own feelings – if you have no access to your own inner wisdom or if you do not trust it.

How is it that just people in auxiliary medical professions (those with insight into, but some distance from the traditional medical health system) often start to question the knowledge and skills of physicians in certain areas , and thus to doubt the validity of their conclusions? It is by the experience that even doctors are not medically omniscient and sometimes pass on insufficient information to their patients, which can be supplemented or corrected by a holistic therapist with good client rapport trained to see the overall picture as well as the personality and needs of the individual.

To consciously create a reality, we need more than just understanding, because the knowledge of the head, the wisdom of the heart and the gut feeling must be in line. One needs the Aha!-experience that makes your insight valid at all levels, all conscious and unconscious areas of the brain and the cells of your body.

What comprehensible explanations are there for holding on to concepts whose general validity is already refuted??

  • Tradition of the old concept in one´s own beliefs and linked to one´s own identification
  • the feeling of dependence on the community sharing the belief in the old concept, and linked to that:
  • the feeling of dependence on workplace and supply
  • cognitive overload and unwillingness to ponder alternative concepts in depth
  • the projection of one´s own feelings and values ​​to others, deriving invalid general conclusions
  • the feeling of loss of control through a paradigm shift
  • relief of one´s own responsibility by following the mainstream.
  • avoiding emotionally charged topics
  • linking the issue with guilt

All these reasons are produced in the reptile brain, are deeply rooted and emotional. Therefore, the contributions in discussions about alternative views of medicine, disease and prevention are often characterized by very emotional posts and attacks. Of course, this does not do justice to the meaning of science and research. Ideally, scientists would be free of the factors above – which in practice is rarely the case, because even scientists have a reptile brain …
Unless something else is so much more important. Unless you had an own Aha!-experience. Science and research should be more interested in the atypical but possible, as in reproduction of the typical results in studies.

There are already cancers healed without surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. What Angelina Jolie mentioned as “In progress”, is reality today for more and more people. Even with advanced cancer processes, the chance of recovery without traditional treatment but supporting the natural selfhealing powers of the bodymind has been proven in countless cases [6]. Examples of this support are:

  • acid-base balance through nutrition [7]
  • cannabinoids [8]
  • addressing the psycho-biological background of carcinogenesis
  • consistent change of life towards the true desires and goals

And prevention? With the understanding of META-Health, the attention and the confidence in the wisdom and consistency of one´s own organism, prevention of trauma is hardly possible, nor would it be necessary. We do not need to prevent basically meaningful processes. However, you will take care of optimizing the rhythms and processes by optimal supply and disposal. This concerns the supply of nutrients just as the supply of solution-oriented information and the disposal and release of wastes as well as outdated scenarios and emotions.

If Angelina Jolie can not adopt this view, her choice of preventive mastectomy is consistent. She does not plan to breastfeed children any more. But what about women who still want to give birth? Wouldn´t they, without information about the above options, be unnecessarily led into a one-way street?

To deal with one´s fears, there are no generally right and wrong ways, just individually coherent ones..

Choose the one that strengthens YOU!

Kora

PS: Find the original article in German here

Sources:
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html?hp&_r=2&
[2] http://scienceblogs.de/bloodnacid/2012/09/03/basics-apoptose-oder-der-programmierte-zelltod/
[3] http://www.cochrane.dk/screening/mammografi-de.pdf
[4] http://www.peter-spork.de/87-0-Schutz-aus-dem-Erbgut.html
[5] http://www.science-meets-society.com/wissenschaftsnews/traumatische-epigenetik/
[6] http://www.krebstherapien.de/page0/page7/index.html
[7] http://www.nam.de/onkolog.htm
[8] http://cannabisoilmediadocument.blogspot.com/2012/06/introduction-my-name-is-justin-kander.html

Images:
[1] By chris_natt (Angelina Jolie) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AJolietop2.png
[2] Walter Groesel
http://www.sxc.hu/photo/718085
[3] By Rodolfa, K.T., Inducing pluripotency (September 30, 2008), StemBook, ed. The Stem Cell Research Community, StemBook, doi/10.3824/stembook.1.22.1, http://www.stembook.org. [CC-BY-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_epigenetic_landscape_and_its_implications_for_direct_reprogramming..jpg